Category Archives: Virus

Remove Fake Tool Security WinXP/Vista/Win7

XP Home Security, Vista Home Security 2011, Win 7 Internet Security adalah versi baru dari multi-bernama Rogue Anti-spyware dari keluarga Braviax adalah peringatan yang berlebihan. Para bajingan diberi nama secara acak, tergantung pada Sistem Operasi, dan selalu mempunyai versi nama OS nya. Hal ini membedakan mereka dari mayoritas perangkat lunak yang sah dan bajingan lainnya.

(screenshot berbea bergantung windows nya (WInxp/Vista/Win7) dan versi mereka berubah sesuai tahun yg diset di komputer, biar kelihatan up to date)


Nama parasit adalah sebagai berikut:

Win 7 names Vista names XP names
Win 7 Anti-virus (2011) Vista Anti-virus (2011) XP Anti-virus (2011)
Win 7 Anti-Spyware (2011) Vista Anti-Spyware (2011) XP Anti-Spyware (2011)
Win 7 Home Security (2011) Vista Home Security (2011) XP Home Security (2011)
Win 7 Total Security (2011) Vista Total Security (2011) XP Total Security (2011)
Win 7 Security (2011) Vista Security (2011) XP Security (2011)
Win 7 Internet Security (2011) Vista Internet Security (2011) XP Internet Security (2011)

Pertama, Anda mungkin melihat peringatan ketika Anda mencoba membuka applikasi. peringatanya seperti berikut:

Win 7 Home security 2011 Firewall Alert
Win 7 Home security 2011 has blocked a program from accessing the internet
Internet Explorer is infected with Trojan-BNK.Win32.Keylogger.gen
Private data can be stolen by third parties, including credit card details and passwords.

Meskipun terlihat sah, sebagian besar antivirus hanya akan menonaktifkan addon keylogger dari terinfeksi IE jika ini terjadi. Jadi jelas, bahwa pesan ini salah.
Kemudian mulai menunjukkan peringatan pesan, mengklaim bahwa PC Anda sedang diserang atau terinfeksi berat.

Remove Fake Ms Removal Tool

Tinjauan masalah:
MS Removal Tool adalah aplikasi keamanan palsu yang muncul dengan ton infeksi dan ancaman keamanan untuk membuat Anda berpikir bahwa komputer Anda terinfeksi dengan perangkat lunak berbahaya. scareware ini dapat melaporkan hingga 30 infeksi pada komputer Anda yang bahkan tidak ada. Selain itu, scan sedikit terlalu cepat untuk menjadi nyata. Ini biaya sekitar $ 60 untuk menghapus ancaman dan bahkan mengklaim bahwa PC Anda akan terlindungi dari malware lain jika Anda memilih untuk membeli versi lengkap dari MS Removal Tool. Tentu saja, Anda tidak harus membayar untuk ini AV jahat. Omong-omong, jangan kacaukan aplikasi ini palsu dengan Microsoft Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool yang merupakan alat sah. Cyber-penjahat jelas ingin mendapatkan beberapa kredibilitas dengan nama-nama terkenal di sini.

World of Warcraft Phishing

A new wave of phishing messages targeted at World Of Warcraft players has appeared these days. The messages follow the same pattern: the “From” field is spoofed (trying to make the user believe that the message comes from Blizzard) and the body of the message talks about the user account being under investigation and suspended. The messages also say that all this happened because the user presumably violated the Terms of Service or the Blizzard EULA.

Fig. 1: This is how the phishing mails for World of Warcraft accounts look like

More About Worm BD Conflicker.C

This about more of Downadup Conflicker.C description, in the avira antivirus detected as below:

Virus: Worm/Conficker
Date discovered: 14/01/2009
Type: Worm
In the wild: Yes
Reported Infections: Medium
Distribution Potential: Medium
Damage Potential: Medium
Static file: No
File size: ~160.000 Bytes
IVDF version: 7.01.01.115 – Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:44 (GMT+1)

General detetected in another antivirus :

Methods of propagation:
• Local network
• Mapped network drives

Aliases:
• Symantec: W32.Downadup.B
• Kaspersky: Net-Worm.Win32.Kido.fw
• F-Secure: Worm:W32/Downadup.gen!A
• Sophos: Mal/Conficker-A
• Panda: Trj/Downloader.MDW
• Grisoft: I-Worm/Generic.CJY
• Eset: a variant of Win32/Conficker.AE worm
• Bitdefender: Win32.Worm.Downadup.Gen

Similar detection:
• Worm/Kido

Platforms / OS:
• Windows 95
• Windows 98
• Windows 98 SE
• Windows NT
• Windows ME
• Windows 2000
• Windows XP
• Windows 2003

Side effects:
• Registry modification
• Makes use of software vulnerability

• Third party control

BD Conficker.C & Removal Tool

Virus Downadup since the beginning of February 2009 is being spread quickly, BitDefender provides tools virus.
Worm Downadup Win32/Conficker.C target large scale attack on 1 April. Worm Downadup Win32/Conficker.C as variants to 3, has the ability memblock some website security system, turning off the security system of Windows components and download the file at random to lead the web to a particular site.

When the Worm Downadup Win32/Conficker.C downloaded and activated by accident on the computer. The worm will copy itself to create a random file name in the Windows System. Worm sometimes release some of the file that is input into the program directory.
Worm Downadup Win32/Conficker.C will be active each time the computer is turned on, because it can be registered from the list of programs that should be active when the computer starts is enabled.
Computer Worm infected Downadup Win32/Conficker.C, directly taking some steps such as turning off the antivirus update system.

Worm will turn off service from Windows:
* wscsvc – Security Center
* WinDefend Windows Defender (Vista)
* wuauserv – Automatic Updates
* BITS – Background Intelligent Transfer Service
* ERSvc – Error Reporting Service

Brand Paling Banyak Terkena Phising di tahun 2009

Hampir selama tahun 2009, pertempuran untuk tempat pertama untuk target phishing terjadi antara Ebay dan Chase Bank. Sebagian besar, Bank Chase berada paling atas merek yang kena phising.

Pada bulan Desember, situasi itu berubah: Sekarang PayPal adalah merek yang paling sering kena phished (URL unik 32.205) diikuti dari jauh oleh Chase Bank (URL unik 25.901) dan Ebay (URL unik 18.738).



Mengapa perubahan ini? Kemungkinan besar itu ada hubungannya dengan kenyataan bahwa banyak orang yang menggunakan PayPal untuk membayar hadiah Natal.

Aman selama liburan musim dingin dan selalu menulis alamat PayPal dan bank-bank online lainnya dalam browser sendiri dan tidak pernah klik link dalam email.

 

 

sumber: techblog.avira.com (Sorin Mustaca)

{jcomments on} 

Spam-host oleh Google Notebook

Sebagian besar email spam yang beredar hari ini mengandung satu atau dua URL yang menunjukkan gambar dan menunjuk ke situs spam. Sesuatu seperti ini:
<a href=”http://spam-site.com”> <img src=”http://picture-site.com/picture.jpg> </ a>

Beberapa spam juga berisi URL yang menunjuk ke situs-situs bereputasi tinggi seperti msn.com, Microsoft.com dan lain-lain. Teknik ini digunakan untuk membingungkan spam filter dengan konten spam meracuni. Pada dasarnya, kami memiliki beberapa URL yang mencurigakan (atau seharusnya saya menyebut mereka berbahaya?) Yang dapat blacklist tanpa masalah.

Spammer, tentu saja, menyadari fungsi ini dan telah ditemukan sejak lama berbeda dari iklan mereka vektor URL: Melalui berbagai kelompok (Yahoo, Google, dll), Blog, Jaringan Sosial situs-situs seperti Twitter, Google Documents, mesin pencari pengalihan , dan seterusnya.

Metode lain, yang tidak begitu banyak digunakan sampai saat ini, adalah Google Notebook. Beberapa hari yang lalu aku menemukan sebuah email spam yang tidak ada hal lain dalam daripada satu URL yang menunjuk ke Google Notebook: http://google.com/notebook/public/ <large-number> / <large-text>.

W32/Induc.A Removal Tool

Here’s something you don’t see every day – a virus that infects Delphi files … at compile-time.



When a file infected with W32/Induc-A runs, it looks to see if it can find a Delphi installation on the current machine. If it finds one, it tries to write malicious code to SysConst.pas, which it then compiles to SysConst.dcu (after saving the old copy of this file to SysConst.bak). The new infected SysConst.dcu file will then add W32/Induc-A code to every new Delphi file that gets compiled on the system – some of the strings from the inserted code look like this:



If you find detections of this in 3rd-party software, you might want to contact your suppliers to let them know they need to have a look at their system … and also take care to check machines you might have with Delphi installed.



There’s a classic paper called Reflections on Trusting Trust, that concludes that you can’t trust code that you didn’t write yourself from the very lowest level – this is a great example of where compiling the code yourself doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s clean.

Update: Please be aware – this virus isn’t just a threat if you are a software developer who uses Delphi. It’s possible that you are running programs which are written in Delphi on your computers, and they could be affected. Sophos has received thousands of reports of programs infected by W32/Induc-A.


 


Removal tool W32/Induc


Last week a virus that infects Delphi development environments and then the compiled Delphi programs was detected and got some media attention – infected programs were distributed on cover-mount CDs and DVDs on computer magazines and via Download Portals.

Avira’s developers created a special version of our Avira Removal Tool which is capable of detecting and deleting infected programs. You can download the English version here and the German version here!

 {jcomments on}

what happened to the Conficker worm?

Are you still remember with worm conficker? … The hugely talked-about computer worm seemed poised to wreak havoc on the world’s machines on April Fool’s Day. And then … nothing much happened. But while the doom and gloom forecast for the massive botnet — a remotely controlled network that security experts say infected about 5 million computers — never came to pass, Conficker is still making some worm hunters nervous. Phillip Porras, program director at SRI International, a nonprofit research group, said Conficker infects millions of machines around the world. And the malware’s author or authors could use that infected network to steal information or make money off of the compromised computer users.

“Conficker does stand out as one of those bots that is very large and has been able to sustain itself on the Web,” which is rare, said Porras, who also is a member of the international group tracking Conficker. Still, computer users, even those infected with Conficker, haven’t seen much in the way of terrifying results. After the botnet relaunched April 1, it gained further access to an army of computers that the program’s author or authors could control.The only thing the author or authors have done with that power, though, is to try to sell fake computer-security software to a relatively small segment of Conficker-stricken computers, Porras said. The lack of a major attack has led some people in the security community to assume that the worm is basically dead.

Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer with F-Secure, an Internet security company, says the people who created Conficker would have launched a major offensive by now if they were going to. Hypponen, who is scheduled to speak about the Conficker botnet next week at Black Hat, a major computer security conference, said he thinks whoever made Conficker didn’t mean for the worm to get so large, as the size of the botnet drew widespread attention from the security community and the media.

“This gang, they knew their stuff. They used cutting-edge technology that we had never before. … I’ve been working in viruses for 20 years, and there were several things that I’d never seen at all,” he said. “That, to me, would tell that perhaps this is a new group or a new gang, someone who tried it for the first time.” He added, “The more experienced attackers don’t let their viruses or their worms spread this widely. They, on purpose, keep their viruses smaller in size in order to keep them from headlines.”

Veteran botnet creators tend to hold the size of the malicious networks to about 2,000 to 10,000 computers to keep from being noticed, he said. “Even if the [Conficker] gang would want to continue operations, most likely they would drop the current botnet and start something new,” he said. Don DeBolt, director of threat research for CA, an information technology company, said researchers are still watching Conficker.

“It’s still being tracked, so it is still active out there, but certainly the threat has been mitigated by all of the attention and focus that it has received,” he said. DeBolt said the press hyped the Conficker story because it was tied to April Fool’s Day and because it made so many computers vulnerable to attack. He said other viruses and botnets pose more serious threats. Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, a computer security company, said the infected Conficker network is still growing.

“The interesting thing is, the hackers never really did much with the botnet that they created. So they created an army of lots and lots of computers … but they’ve never really done anything with it,” he said. “They were almost frightened off doing it.” Others disagree with that assessment.

Hypponen said Conficker was not hype; it was the largest network of its kind seen since 2003 and deserved the attention it got from the security community and from the public. Porras said theories about the the motives of Conficker’s creator are based on speculation. The important thing, he said, is that security experts will continue to work to reduce the number of computers infected with the worm.

{googleAds}

World of Warcraft Phishing

A new wave of phishing messages targeted at World Of Warcraft players has appeared these days. The messages follow the same pattern: the “From” field is spoofed (trying to make the user believe that the message comes from Blizzard) and the body of the message talks about the user account being under investigation and suspended. The messages also say that all this happened because the user presumably violated the Terms of Service or the Blizzard EULA.

 

Fig. 1: This is how the phishing mails for World of Warcraft accounts look like

The user is requested to fill out an online form, to verify that she is the legitimate owner of the account. Of course, the online form is on a fake, rogue website that has no connection with Blizzard whatsoever. (http://battlenet.account-verification.***.rehash.net/). This makes it fairly easy to spot that the message is a scam.

The message is well conceived; it starts with “Greetings”, as many legitimate messages from Blizzard do. Unlike many other phishing messages, its content is also grammatically correct and without spelling mistakes. Maybe the phishers finally managed to find someone who can write correctly? 

 

eXTReMe Tracker
.